"We have to take responsibility. Science has always thrived on war. The greatest weapons of mass destruction were created by scientists who wanted to be famous." -- Otacon from Metal Gear Solid
"If we cut up beasts simply because they cannot prevent us and because we are backing our own side in the struggle for existence, it is only logical to cut up imbeciles, criminals, enemies, or capitalists for the same reasons." -- C. S. Lewis
This is now a three part series exposes the murderers who want to keep the violence against Wolves going, in spite of the new ESA ruling.
Now Ralph Morgenweck ralph_morgenweck@fws.gov, director of the service’s Mountain-Prairie Region is getting into the act. Overturning the ESA and ignoring Non Lethal Methods and Predator Friendly Ranching will cause more violence and oppression of Wolves!
Carter Niemeyer also thinks that "reasonable people" are doing justice by wanting to kill wolves, thanks to the 10j rule! Contact him at carter_niemeyer@fws.gov!
Email him today at the email address listed above and voice your outrage against these continued acts of violence and hypocrisy!
The links and information that you should use, are these..
'Ervin's Natural Beef is a consortium of ranchers that produces grassfed beef. Their emphasis is on humane treatment of livestock and peaceful co-existence with predators. The animals are free of pesticides, antibiotics, and synthetic hormones. The ranchers are currently applying for organic certification.'
------------------
Predator Friendly Non Lethal Methods for Ervins Grassfed Beef
http://www.ervins.com/Export6.htm
------------------
'Predator-Friendly Wool'
http://www.loe.org/archives/970110.htm#Ranching-----------------
Lamb and Wool, a Ranch dedicated to not using lethal methods against predators
http://www.lambandwool.com/-----------------
Predator Friendly Fact Sheet
http://www.heartofthewolf.org/factsheet.html----------------
'Wolf Friendly Beef' - http://www.acfnewsource.org/environment/wolf_friendly_beef.html
-----------------
'Predator-Friendly Wool'
http://www.loe.org/archives/970110.htm#Ranching------------------
'Some ranchers see 'predator friendly' as selling point with consumers' By BECKY BOHRER
http://www.casperstartribune.net/articles/2004/07/18/news/regional/1aee40fb0504 f55687256ed4005f50ec.txt---------------
Crying wolf over predator attacks http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99996428
And here is the original article.
Court decision does not affect local wolves
by Todd Adams
Wolves and wolf issues have been active the past couple of weeks, not only
on local ranches but also in the federal courts and bureaucracy.
A recent court decision does not affect wolves in the experimental
population area of central Idaho, southwest Montana and Wyoming (Yellowstone
National Park), but a rule change does.
The U.S. District Court in Portland, Oregon issued a decision January 31
that reclassifies wolves from threatened to endangered status outside the
experimental, non-essential population area (in Montana south of Interstate
90 and south of the Missouri River and in Idaho south of I-90).
According to a service news release, this means nobody can legally shoot a
wolf outside the experimental area where wolves were reintroduced in 1995,
unless the wolf is an immediate and direct threat to human life.
As a result of the court order, the “outside” wolves newly reclassified as
endangered have the full protection of the ESA and cannot legally be shot by
private individuals or state officials. The “outside” protected wolves are
in Idaho north of I-90 or in Montana north of I-90, west of I-15 and north
of the Missouri River.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service officials interpret the court order, as
mandating that it must conduct all wolf management outside the experimental
area.
“The service strongly advises private citizens not to harm or kill wolves
outside the experimental population areas,” a February 10 news release
stated.
The service had adopted a rule under section 4(d) of the ESA in April of
2003 “downlisting” the “outside” wolves from endangered to threatened
status. That rule was challenged by environmental groups and led to the
court’s January 31 decision to reverse the rule.
“We are disappointed in the court ruling,” said Ralph Morgenweck, director
of the service’s Mountain-Prairie Region. “We are reviewing our legal
options, including appeal.”
Flexibility remains here
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced on February 3 that a new
regulation under section 10(j) of the Endangered Species Act would allow
more flexibility for private citizens to protect their livestock, livestock
herding and guarding animals, and dogs from wolves.
The rule took effect on February 7 and allows private citizens to shoot
wolves, but only inside the experimental population area on private land and
in the act of “attacking, chasing, molesting or harassing” the domestic
critters listed above. Landowners or livestock owners do not need any prior
written authorization, as in the past.
Any wolf shooting must be reported within 24 hours and there must be
physical evidence of a wolf attack.
Niemeyer said that evidence is not limited to dead or wounded livestock, but
can include trampled vegetation, mixed wolf and livestock sign, broken
fences knocked down by stampeding cattle and the like.
The 10(j) rule allows the shooting of wolves in the act of chasing,
molesting or harassing the animals under conditions that would indicate to a
“reasonable person” that an attack is likely to occur at any moment,
Niemeyer said.
Wolf “attack” is defined as biting, wounding or grasping, he said.
The February 3 news release states the following also is allowed inside the
experimental population area.
• Wolves may be shot under the same attack or chase circumstances on public
federal lands by grazing permittees and outfitters and guides that use
livestock as part of their permits and by tribal members on public ceded
lands.
• Wolves that cause unacceptable impacts to wildlife populations such as
deer and elk herds, may be killed by state or tribal agencies. But this is
possible only after science-based documentation has undergone public and
peer review and has been approved by the service.
• Anyone may harass a wolf (scaring it and running it off in such away that
doesn’t hurt the wolf) at any time. It must be reported within seven days.
• States or tribes with approved management plans can take over gray wolf
management in the experimental areas provided agreements are signed with the
service or Secretary of the Interior.
Idaho has an approved plan and will start taking over next summer, Niemeyer
said.
Montana’s plan also has been approved, but the experimental wolf population
cannot be delisted (taken off the ESA) until Wyoming’s plan is approved.
Wyoming and the federal government are in court now over that state’s plan.
http://www.challismessenger.com/newspgs/0217wolves.html ______________________________________
==============================
To return home.
Home
Copyright 2005 Heart of the Wolf